Legal Opinion
Arthur F. Smallfield v. Home Insurance Company of New York, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 14, 1957No. 13657PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Chief Judge.
Smallfield appeals from a judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division sitting in diversity in an action for declaratory relief brought by the Home Insurance Company, hereafter the Company or Appellee, absolving the Company from any liability on a certain policy of insurance covering named pieces of jewelry, and denying Smallfield, hereafter appellant, recovery for loss allegedly suffered by reason of an alleged theft of certain pieces of jewelry covered by said policy.
The present action was brought in October, 1950, and after a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Maneja v. Waialua Agricultural Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Sanders v. LeechCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- Steccone v. Morse-Starrett Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- People v. BurnessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Richard Douglas Furnish and Emilie Furnish Funk v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Gay Cottons, United States of America and Shalom Baby WearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Estate of J. E. O'connell, James O'COnnell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. FranzeseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Walker v. L.G. Everist, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.