Legal Opinion

Hammitt v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 18, 1997No. A96A2059, A96A2060PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

Defendants Hammitt and Crowder were tried jointly and convicted by a jury. They were each sentenced pursuant to merger of two counts of robbery with two counts of armed robbery for the same offenses. OCGA §§ 16-8-40; 16-8-41. The robberies were the joint enterprise of defendants, who took clothing from two youths at knife-point in an alley late at night.

The appeals are consolidated for review and decision because the issues are the same in that Crowder has adopted the enumerations of error and brief of Hammitt. The first enumeration is that the court erred in refusing to grant…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marshall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Rooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Bohannon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Blankenship v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Bennett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API