Legal Opinion

Border Brokerage Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 24, 1966No. C.D. 2689PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Judge:

The protest in this case relates to the importation of certain merchandise invoiced as “Samco Tru Cut Dados.” Each dado, as imported, consists of a circular blade with an integral washer in the center portion and cutting tips welded along the periphery. They were variously referred to in the record as dado cutters, dado heads, and dado saws. The collector constructively segregated them by assessing the blades with duty at 11% per centum ad valorem as parts of machines under paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 54108, and the tips composed of tungsten…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API