Legal Opinion

State v. Lurch

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1885PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Lane County. Defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The appellant herein was indicted by the grand jury of the county of Lane for the crime of forgery, and subsequently tried and convicted of that offense. From the judgment of conviction entered thereon he has appealed to this court. He assigned several grounds of error in his notice of appeal, and which have been submitted for the consideration of the court. We have heard them discussed by the respective counsel in the case, and are of the opinion that no such error was committed as would justify a reversal of the judgment.

The demurrer to the indictment was properly overruled. The latter was…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roberts v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. McDermottIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State v. McElvainOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Capital Power Corporation v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025
  5. Roberts v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API