Legal Opinion

Turnbull v. Monaghan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Alpena. (Kelley, J.) Bill for an - accounting. Complainant and defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is a bill filed for an accounting,. It appears that in 1886 the complainant owned a quantity of cedar lands in Alpena county, and defendants; Rothschild and Monaghan were interested in other cedar lands, and both were operating in getting out posts and ties at Long lake. It was found that these products were likely to become confused, and it was thought to be to the advantage of both parties that they should operate-together in running and loading the ties. An agreement was effected between Rothschild and complainant, and', defendant O’Brien as trustee, which recited, in substance,, the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Polk v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. O'Brien v. Alpena Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Turnbull v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API