Legal Opinion

Motor Vehicle Administration v. Seenath

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 23, 2016No. 82/15Published

1Opinion of the Court

Motor Vehicle Admin. v. Sundar Seenath, No. 82, September Term, 2015 MD. CODE ANN., TRANSP. (1977, 2012 REPL. VOL., 2015 SUPP.) § 16-205.1 – IMPLIED CONSENT, ADMINISTRATIVE PER SE LAW – ADVICE OF RIGHTS FORM – DUE PROCESS – Court of Appeals held that Motor Vehicle Administration Advice of Rights form is neither invalid as applied nor facially invalid in that form is not misleading as to eligibility of holder of commercial driver’s license for restrictive license where commercial driver’s license holder drives non-commercial motor vehicle and fails alcohol concentration test. Circuit Court for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. National Endowment for the Arts v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Shelby County v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Comptroller of Treasury of Md. v. WynneSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API