Heller v. Cuddy
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Pending this action, the defendant, John L. Cuddy, departed this life and his administratrix has been substituted in his place. The suit is by indorsees against the acceptor of three trade acceptances. After verdict for defendant, plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
The acceptances were given by Mr. Cuddy August 25, 1924, to and in favor of Aristocrat Manufacturing & Distributing Company of Chicago. They evidence Mr. Cuddy’s obligation to pay for certain washing machines purchased from the Aristocrat company.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- King Cattle Co. v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- State Bank of Swea City v. LovrenzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
3Cited by12 opinions
- Westlake Mercantile Finance Corp. v. MerrittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Coopersmith v. MaunzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis v. ShusterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- First Bank of Marianna v. Havana Canning Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940
- First National Bank v. Power Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.