Legal Opinion

Mead v. Stirling

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 15, 1892PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In the Court of Common Pleas of Fairfield County, November Term, 1892. Suit for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

The complaint herein alleges in substance that the plaintiff is “Worshipful Master” and presiding officer of a local lodge of Ancient Free and Accepted Masons, to which office he was elected on an undesignated day in December, 1891, for the term of one year thereafter and until his successor should be chosen.

That said office is one “ of honor and position in the lodge and in the order generally outside of the lodge.”

That the defendant is “ Grand Master of the Grand Lodge *587of Masons of Connecticut ” within the jurisdiction of which said local lodge is.

That the plaintiff at a “ communication of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. People ex rel. Rice v. Board of TradeIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Chamberlain v. LincolnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  4. Connelly v. Masonic Mutual Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  5. Oliver v. HopkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kenyon v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Lawson v. HewellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. White v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  4. Gardner v. East Rock Lodge, No. 141Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  5. Crutcher v. Eastern Division, No. 321, of the Order of Railway Conductors of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API