Legal Opinion

Moskowitz v. Moskowitz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 13, 1993No. 92-2387PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court lacked the discretion to enter an order ratifying a general master’s report just two days after its entry. The provisions of rule 1.490(h), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, are mandatory. The rule authorizes the trial court to take appropriate action on the master’s report only if no exceptions are taken within a 10 day period. If exceptions are filed, they are to be heard.

The clear import of the rule is that a trial court may take appropriate action only after the court hears the exceptions. Therefore, it was error to deny appellant’s motion to vacate the premature order.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Berkheimer v. BerkheimerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Kay v. KayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Cox v. CoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Elliott v. ElliottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Dembrowski v. DembrowskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dehler v. DehlerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Scott v. ScottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Werntz v. FloydDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API