Legal Opinion

Kopelman v. McClure

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 4, 1989No. 8828DC788Published

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Defendant did not object or except to the partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs with respect to liability entered by Judge Roda on 9 October 1987 nor did defendant cross-appeal from the judgment entered on 13 January 1988. Thus, no question is raised on this appeal regarding the propriety of partial summary judgment for plaintiffs as to liability entered on 9 October 1987.

Our Supreme Court in Bank v. Hanner, 268 N.C. 668, 670, 151 S.E. 2d 579, 580 (1966) stated:

The power of one judge of the superior court is equal to and coordinate with that of another, and a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Michigan National Bank v. HannerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API