Legal Opinion

United States v. Alfred D. Arellanes

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 7, 1985No. 84-4022PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

The defendant appeals from the district court’s denial of a motion to vacate his criminal sentence. Because the record does not conclusively show that the defendant was entitled to no relief, we remand this case for further proceedings on the defendant’s claim that his guilty plea was not voluntary.

I

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

In August 1981, the defendant was indicted in the District of Oregon for violations of federal narcotics laws. On the day that he was to go to trial, he was served with another indictment from the Western District of Missouri charging him with more…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Steven W. ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. Lawrence Leroy Farrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. Walter L. Jones, United States of America v. Calvin BainesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. Vernon Earl WaldenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Herminio HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Michael G. Doganiere v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. State v. WagstaffArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. United States v. Donald Freeman OwensCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Mark I. Tebha, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. PEOPLE of the Territory of Guam, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro D. MATERNE, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API