Hurd v. Neilson
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Hamilton District Court. — Hon. B. P. Birds all, Judge. This is an action to recover a commission for tbe sale of real estate. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.—
1Opinion of the CourtKinne, C. J.
1 Defendant, who was the owner of three hundred and fifty-six acres in Hamilton county, Iowa, placed the same for sale with the plaintiffs, who were land agents residing in said county. The terms of sale authorized by the defendants were embraced in a letter of date of August 18,1894, written by him to Hurd, one of the plaintiffs. It was as *556follows: “Dear Sir: Yours of August 18th received and noted. In regard to the amount of land that I have near Blairsburg, is 856 acres. Part of it is on section 25, and the balance on the 36th section. Land commences about 80 rods east of the station. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Meyer v. HouckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Beckman v. Consolidation Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
3Cited by12 opinions
- McDermott v. MahoneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Potter v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- McGlade v. City of WaterlooSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Sevening v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Ball v. DolanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.