Legal Opinion

Loghry v. Loghry

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1996No. 95-207PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The single issue for resolution is whether a trial setting notice in a divorce action served upon a party, but not upon the party’s attorney, satisfies the requirements of constitutional due process. After counsel appeared for the defendant in the divorce action, a notice of trial setting allegedly was served by mail upon the defendant, but was not served upon her counsel. When a party is represented by an attorney, Wyo.R.Civ.P. 5(b) requires that service be made upon the attorney, unless the court orders otherwise. We hold, under the circumstances of this case, the notice of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. DS v. Department of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Michael v. HertzlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Sandstrom v. SandstromWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hall v. HallWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jeffrey R. Arnott v. Paula a/k/a Polly A. ArnottWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In the Matter of Guardianship of MeoWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Frost Construction Co. v. Lobo, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re" H" ChildrenWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. DH v. Wyoming Department of Family ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API