Legal Opinion
Thomas A. McDaniel v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 23, 2014No. ED100204PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, JUDGE
Thomas A. McDaniel (“Movant”) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
On September 14, 2006, Movant was charged by information with one count of first-degree statutory sodomy. The information alleged that between December 1, 2005 and December 31, 2005, Movant had deviate sexual intercourse with the victim (“Victim”), who was less than twelve years old, by touching Victim’s penis with his hand.
A. The Evidence Adduced at Trial
The following evidence was adduced at Movant’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Nathaniel A. Robinson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- LaVincent Tyrell Robinson, Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- STEPHEN K. COX v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Cusumano v. GriffithDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.