Main v. Jarrett
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Phillips Circuit Court; Hcmce N. Hutton, Judge; 1. The verdict of the jury had no evidence to support it. The court properly instructed the jury, but they totally disregarded the evidence. 97 S. W. 56; 98 Id. 709; 76 Ark. 372. A delivery to the carrier was delivered to the consignee. 2. The judgment should be reversed and remanded with directions to «render judgment for the plaintiffs. 58 Ark. 441; 98 S. W. 118; 55 Ark. 85; 50 Id. 85; 46 Id. 17; Kirby’s Digest, §…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Phillips Circuit Court; Hcmce N. Hutton, Judge; 1. The verdict of the jury had no evidence to support it. The court properly instructed the jury, but they totally disregarded the evidence. 97 S. W. 56; 98 Id. 709; 76 Ark. 372. A delivery to the carrier was delivered to the consignee. 2. The judgment should be reversed and remanded with directions to «render judgment for the plaintiffs. 58 Ark. 441; 98 S. W. 118; 55 Ark. 85; 50 Id. 85; 46 Id. 17; Kirby’s Digest, § 1236.' The verdict is warranted by the evidence. The conduct of appellees was such as to surround the transaction with…
1Opinion of the CourtBattle, J.
W. F. Main & Company sued W. B. Jarrett and others for $191.60, the amount due them for goods sold. A part of the goods was a show case. According to the terms of the contract the goods were to become the property of the defendants upon the delivery of the same to a transportation company at Iowa 'City, in the State of Iowa, consigned to the defendants. The controversy in this case is as to the delivery of the show case.
M. H. Taylor testified that plaintiffs delivered • this show case to the transportation company for the defendants, consigned to them, and made a part of his testimony the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Bradley Lumber Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Capitol Food Co. v. ModeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Sledge & Norfleet Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923