Legal Opinion

Fulton v. Huggans

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1941No. 8,199PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

Plaintiffs recovered a judgment in the sum of $260 in an action on an account stated and defendant appealed. The case by agreement was tried to the court without a jury. The alleged indebtedness arose by virtue of purchases made by the defendant at the plaintiffs’ hardware store. The plaintiffs’ accounts had been destroyed by fire in December, 1936, before the action was instituted. Plaintiffs alleged an account stated and sought to prove the indebtedness by showing that an account was rendered to the defendant and that defendant did not object to the account as stated.

The point briefed and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Norum v. Ohio Oil Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1928
  2. O'Hanlon Co. v. JessMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Baldwin v. SilverMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Mutch & Young v. PowersMontana Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Olsen v. SundlingMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Hursh v. Mon-O-Co. Oil Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API