Legal Opinion

State v. Little

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 22, 1917PublishedCited by 8 opinions

AttachmeNt for contempt, beard before Long, J., at July Criminal Term, 1917, of Richmond. • On notices issued, tbe court beard tbe evidence submitted on affidavits; made full and pertinent findings of fact, which- are spread upon tbe record, and thereupon adjudged defendant guilty of contempt and imposed a fine and imprisonment. Defendant excepted and appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHoice, J.

It appears from tbe findings of fact which accompany tbe case on appeal and are a part of it that, at tbe criminal term aforesaid, indictments were pending against defendant for illegal traffic in spirituous liquors and that a brother of defendant, Hector Little, was also indicted for similar offenses, and that a principal witness against these defendants was one ~W. E. Reynolds; that on Tuesday night of tbe term about 9 P. M., before tbe trial of tbe cases, at a cafe in tbe town of Rockingham, near tbe court bouse and near tbe hotel where tbe judge was staying, tbe said witness was violently…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. People v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Cartwright's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  4. In Re DeatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Ex Parte McCownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. MehraSupreme Court of Virginia · 2011
  2. Galyon v. StuttsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Luther v. LutherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. The STATE v. GoffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  5. Ex Parte SchenckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API