Carreras v. Hollister's Heirs
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DORE, Judge.
The issues in this case are fully stated in our opinion and decree remanding the case for the purpose of completing the record by the inclusion therein of the records of three suits referred to in the answer and made a part thereof. See 19S So. 65. The three records now have been included in the transcript. As stated in the original opinion, there are three principal questions to be considered in the case, namely: (1) Is the plaintiff the owner and holder of the note? (2) If so, is the note and mortgage invalid because of the mental incapacity of Mrs. Hollister at the time of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Butler v. AustinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Reiners v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
3Cited by3 opinions
- Penn v. BurkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- Davis v. DavisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
- Penn v. BurkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962