Legal Opinion
Fritz Carlos Bohme Zuniga v. David Venturella, et al.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided August 7, 2026No. 5:26-cv-00205Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY PADUCAH DIVISION FRITZ CARLOS BOHME ZUNIGA, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 5:26-cv-205-RGJ DAVID VENTURELLA, et al., Respondents. * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Fritz Carlos Bohme Zuniga’s Writ of Habeas Corpus. [DE 1]. Respondents responded on July 20, 2026. [DE 8]. Petitioner replied on July 25, 2026. [DE 14]. The parties agree no evidentiary hearing is necessary. [DE 9; DE 12]. This matter is ripe for adjudication. For the reasons below, the Court DENIES the Petition for Writ of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Demore v. KimSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Nielsen v. PreapSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- R-A-V-PBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.