In re New York State Rys.
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, District Judge.
On July 2, 1936, the attorneys listed above met with me in conference for the purpose of devising methods to facilitate the issuance of a proposed plan for reorganization of the Rochester property of debtor. All were in agreement that certain disputed legal questions should be settled before any proposed plan is put forth. These questions relate to claims of various classes of creditors to certain funds. It was stipulated, on the record by the parties present, that these questions be submitted by briefs and reply briefs and that my decision thereon be final. The parties…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Union Trust Co. v. Illinois Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Miltenberger v. Logansport Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- United States Trust Co. v. Wabash Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Matter of Post v. . Burger GohlkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re REA Express, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Rea Express, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977