Legal Opinion
Environmental Defense Fund Inc. v. Johnson
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 3, 1979No. 79 Civ. 2228PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GAGLIARDI, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, a consortium of public interest organizations concerned with the conservation of the nation’s scenic and natural resources, commenced this action for declaratory and injunctive relief alleging that the defendants, the North Atlantic Division of the State Army Corps of Engineers and several of its officers, prepared plans for the Hudson River Skimming Project in violation of the Water Resources Planning Act (“WRPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1962 et seq., the Northeast Water Supply Act (“NEWS”), 42 U.S.C. § 1962d-4, and the National Environmental Policy Act…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gardner v. Toilet Goods Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Storer Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State of Cal. v. BerglandDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1980
- National Wildlife Federation v. GoldschmidtDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
- Atlantic Terminal Urban Renewal Area Coalition v. New York City Department of Environmental ProtectionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Atura Coalition v. Nyc Dept. of Env. Prot.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. James A. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980