Legal Opinion

Hatfield v. Gracen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1977No. 75-1879, SC 24712PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

This is an action for damages in which plaintiff seeks recovery for personal injuries and property damages as well as punitive damages. Plaintiffs complaint alleged that the defendant James Gracen recklessly discharged a firearm which injured plaintiff and damaged his vehicle. 1 In a separate count, plaintiff also alleged that the defendant was negligent "in discharging his firearm in close proximity to and in the direction of the person of plaintiff.” The jury returned a general verdict for defendants, and plaintiff appealed from the judgment entered thereon. We affirm.

Because of the jury…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gibson v. PayneOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  2. State v. WeberOregon Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Conway v. Pacific UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Miller v. Civil Constructors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. Thomas v. InmanOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Blais v. Town of GoffstownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  5. Giant Food, Inc. v. ScherryCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API