Legal Opinion
Salem v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 24, 2011No. 10-1078PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge TRAXLER and Judge KING joined.
OPINION
DIAZ, Circuit Judge:
This appeal arises from entry of an order of removal under section 237(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”). The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) found petitioner removable and ineligible for cancellation of removal. Petitioner concedes removability but contests the eligibility ruling. Because petitioner has not satisfied his statutorily prescribed burden of demonstrating eligibility, we affirm.
I
A
Petitioner Jad George Salem is a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Young v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Manuel Mondragon v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Ali Karimi v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Lucio-Rayos v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Anh Le v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.