Legal Opinion

Low v. Arnstein

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 17, 1898Published

Assumpsit, for goods sold and delivered. Appeal from the County Court of Cook County; the Hon. Wales W. Wood, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Windes

Appellants, as partners in the name of Low & McFadden, sued appellee in assumpsit, to recover a balance due on open account for goods sold and delivered. The trial resulted in. a verdict and judgment for defendant, from which appellants appealed. February 12, 1895, and prior to the sale and delivery of any of the goods, the alleged balance due on which is 'the basis of appellants’ claim in this case, the appellant Low, for his personal debt due appellee, gave and delivered to him his note of that date for the sum of $250, bearing interest at 6 per cent per annum, due four months after date,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Casey v. CarverIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Lill v. EganIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Wittram v. WormerIllinois Supreme Court · 1867

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API