Legal Opinion
Dyan A. Truesdell v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group, a Partnership and the Hospital and Service Employees International Union, Local 399
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 20, 2002No. 01-56228PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRABER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Dyan Truesdell sued her former employer, Southern California Perma-nente Medical Group (Permanente), and her union, The Hospital and Service Employees International Union, Local 399 (the Union), alleging -wrongful termination and breach of the duty of fair representation. Arguing that the complaint was factually misleading and legally without merit, Permanente moved for sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 against Plaintiffs lawyer. The district court granted the motion. We vacate the district court’s order and remand for reconsideration in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Richard E. Loux v. B. J. Rhay, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v. RawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- James E. Peterson v. Harold Kennedy, Richard A. Berthelsen, and National Football League Players AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Marquez v. Screen Actors Guild, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Holgate v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Sneller v. City of Bainbridge IslandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Li v. Majestic Industrial Hills LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Kari Lake v. Bill GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- Robert Matz v. Cepia L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.