Frochter v. Arenholz
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jones
This is an action in case brought by the defendant in error in the circuit court of Peoria county against the plaintiffs in error jointly. The declaration contains two counts, and by apt averments charges that defendant in error received personal injuries in consequence of the concurrent negligence of plaintiffs in error. Both counts aver that defendant in error was in the exercise of due care and caution for his own safety. Plaintiffs in error filed separate pleas and were represented by different counsel. A trial was had before a jury and a verdict rendered against them jointly for $5,000.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Chicago v. McGivenIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Seymour v. O. S. Richardson Fueling Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Iroquois Furnace Co. v. McCreaIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Aetitus v. Spring Valley Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. BaddeleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Herget Nat. Bank of Pekin v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Rhoden v. Peoria Creamery Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1934
- Barrett v. Nash Finch Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Fitzpatrick v. California & Hawaiian Sugar Refining Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1941
- Quirk v. SchrammAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.