Legal Opinion

Sexton v. Amos

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1878PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Wayne. Trover against a garnishee. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

Sexton having sued Sink before a justice upon a cause of action on contract, garnished Amos upon an affidavit that he was indebted to Sink %nd had in his possession or under his control property, money, or effects belonging to Sink. The garnishee summons was made returnable May 15, 1878, and was served on the 4th .of that month, and on the return day Amos appeared and being examined on behalf of plaintiff made this statement:

“I am acquainted with Augustus R. Sink. I leased some personal property of him some time ago. I had it in my possession when garnishee summons in this cause was served. I…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fay v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. Picquet v. SwanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1827
  3. Bostwick v. BassMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. Newell v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Allen v. HazenMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Drake v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Isabelle v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Ball v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Walker v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Ruhl v. A. Ruoff Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API