Legal Opinion

Cantu v. United States

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided May 20, 2024No. 3:15-cv-03896Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION CHRISTOPHER CANTU, § #37143-177, § Movant, § § No. 3:15-CV-3896-K vs. § No. 3:07-CR-197-K § UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, § Respondent. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, Christopher Cantu’s (Movant) Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) Motion for Relief from Void Judgment (doc. 26) is CONSTRUED as a successive petition for a writ of habeas corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

and DISMISSED without prejudice. Alternatively, the motion is DENIED on the merits. I. BACKGROUND Movant was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. United States v. Kendrick FultonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  4. Ruiz v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. SLE, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API