Legal Opinion

Overdorf v. Village of Endicott

New York County Courts

Decided October 2, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert O. Brink, J.

The defendant through its attorneys has moved for an order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint on the ground that the plaintiff, seeking damages for personal injuries resulting from a defective sidewalk, failed to serve a written notice of the defective condition of the sidewalk upon the defendant before the accident, as required by a local law enacted in 1954 by the Trustees of the Village of Endicott. Such local law provides as follows: “ See. 341-a. Liability of village in *884certain actions. No civil action shall be brought or maintained against the Village of Endicott for damages or injuries…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. . City of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Fullerton v. City of SchenectadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Fullerton v. City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  4. Minton v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  5. Boyle v. E. C. Holding Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Valerie Park, Infant, by Her Father, Harry Park, and Harry Park, Individually v. Village of Waverly, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  2. Randle v. City of Rome, New York County Courts1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API