Legal Opinion

Gleason v. Twin Cities Drilling Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1938No. 5668PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Judge.

Plaintiff seeks judgment in this cause for services claimed to have been rendered by him to defendant in connection with the drilling of a well in search of oil and gas on the Garland property situated in De-Soto Parish, Louisiana. The amount demanded is $470. He avers the existence of a lien and privilege on' the well and lease, and on all machinery, equipment, etc., thereto attached, to secure the payment of the claim. Under appropriate allegations, and as prayed for, he obtained the issuance of a writ of provisional seizure, and the aforementioned property was seized.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morehouse Lumber & Building Material Co. v. Jacob & WalkerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. C.F. Dahlberg & Co., Inc., D/B/A St. Mary Galvanizing Corp., Plaintiff v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  2. Sandoz v. A.M.F. Tuboscope, Inc. (In Re Latham Exploration Co.)District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API