Legal Opinion

West v. Capital Trust & Savings Bank

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1942No. 8,196Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOE REHEARING

(Filed April 6, 1942.)

2Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

Plaintiff’s motion for rehearing is based upon the assertion that we failed to consider proof in the record showing affirmatively a want of jurisdiction in the foreclosure action. The evidence in question is an abstract of title offered by defendants and objected to by plaintiff upon the ground that no foundation had been laid for its admission, that many entries contained in it were incompetent, irrelevant and immaterial, and that the exhibit was hearsay. The court overruled the objection to the exhibit, stating that if the court finds that it is…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ervin v. MilneMontana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Aronow v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Rothrock v. BaumanMontana Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API