Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Sanford v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 7, 1997No. CR 96-908Published

1ConcurrenceTom Glaze, Justice

Appellant Damond Sanford’s attorney is about four months past his final extension date for filing Damond’s brief in this cause. Considering the ten days granted by today’s per curiam, counsel has received a total of 214 days to file his brief. I join in granting Sanford another extension, but write to continue to point out this court’s unfair treatment of the State in the same situations and requests. One day, hopefully, we will overrule State v. Tien, 326 Ark. 71, 929 S.W.2d 155 (1996), which requires this court’s dismissal of the State’s case in these situations. See also State v. Bowden,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bowden v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. State v. DoanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API