Legal Opinion

Knowles v. Vickery

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 29, 1984No. 68663PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Judge.

Appellant was injured while waterskiing on a lake owned by appellee Fairfield Plantation, Inc. (“Fairfield”). The injuries were incurred when appellant was unable to turn sharply enough in a cove and ran into the bank. He brought suit against Fairfield and others, basing his suit against appellee on its failure to warn him of the danger of skiing in so narrow a cove. This appeal is from summary judgment granted to Fairfield on the theory of assumption of the risk and on the theory that Fairfield had breached no duty to appellant.

We find appellant’s deposition testimony alone…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. Cox Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Jeffords v. Atlanta Presbytery, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spivey v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API