Legal Opinion

Brown v. Molle Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 16, 1937PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, District Judge.

The bill is for infringement of a copyrighted song. The Mollé Company, manufacturer of shaving cream, engaged StackGoble Advertising Agency, Inc., to put an advertising program on the radio. The Stack-Goble company hired Brown to “build” the show and to direct the program. It was felt that a “theme song” in praise of the product was needed, the song to be rendered at the opening and at the close of each performance. To serve the purpose, Brown concocted a jingle out of advertising slogans already in use by the Mollé Company. He took the well-known music of the West…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. United States Ozone Co. v. United States Ozone Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stuart Scherr and Steven Goodman v. Universal Match Corporation and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  2. Tobani v. Carl Fischer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  3. Sawyer v. Crowell Pub. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  4. Grant v. Kellogg Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  5. Williams v. WeisserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API