Chomicky v. Buttolph
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
Defendants, Edward and Barbara Buttolph, appeal from the lower court’s order granting specific performance of an alleged oral agreement for the sale of property. Plaintiffs, Eugene and Georgianna Chomicky, cross-appeal the denial of their damage claim. We reverse the court’s decree of specific performance on the basis that this dispute is properly resolved under the Statute of Frauds, and affirm the denial of plaintiffs’ claim for damages.
Defendants are landowners of lakeside property on Lake Dun-more. Their property is divided by a road. Intending to retain title to the undeveloped back lot…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Radke v. BrenonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Evarts v. ForteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
- Eliason v. WattsUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Overlock v. Central Vermont Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bassler v. BasslerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Prue v. Royer, Sr., and Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Catamount Slate Products, Inc. v. SheldonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- State v. DelaneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Willey v. WilleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.