Legal Opinion

McClure v. Nowick

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 5, 1964No. 24012Published

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHMER, Commissioner.

A jury was waived. The judgment was for plaintiff under both counts of his petition. Under Count I — an action in replevin —it was adjudged that plaintiff recover *732possession of a television and record player set and $100 in damages for its wrongful detention. Under Count II the judgment was in the sum of $6.50 for usurious interest charged and collected, plus $250 attorney’s fee. Defendant has appealed.

The facts are not materially disputed. The defendant at all times was licensed to and did operate the business of a pawnbroker at 1619-21 East 18th Street, Kansas City,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. McFarlandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Vining v. ProbstMissouri Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Hopper v. HopperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API