Legal Opinion

Siegel v. Braniff Airways Incorporated

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 29, 1960PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVET, District Judge.

The defendant Lockheed Aircraft Corporation (hereinafter designated as “Lockheed”) has moved pursuant to Rule Í2(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. for an order dismissing the second and fifth alleged causes of action in the complaint for failure to state claims upon which relief can be granted. The question involved is whether these claims, which are predicated upon breach of implied warrant of quality and fitness, must be dismissed upon the ground that there was lack of privity between plaintiff and the defendant.

This action seeks recovery for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Jacob E. Decker & Sons, Inc. v. CappsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Spence v. Three Rivers Builders & Masonry Supply, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Roosth & Genecov Production Co. v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Poplar v. Bourjois, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Hunter v. Derby Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Robert D. Putman v. Erie City Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  2. Montgomery v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  3. Middlleton v. United Aircraft CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  4. Noel v. United Aircraft Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962
  5. Conlon v. Republic Aviation CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API