Legal Opinion

People v. Seller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Ottawa. (Arnold, J.) Information for horse-stealing. Respondent brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Respondent, under an ordinary charge of larceny, of a horse, buggy and harness of the value of <¡M?5, *328pleaded guilty, and was sentenced to imprisonment in the State prison for eight years. Error is brought because of excessive sentence.

As the law now stands a sentence which is merely bad for excess may be reversed for the excess, and left to stand for so much as could lawfully be imposed. It is probable that the sentence was intended to be given under the Act of 1877 (IIow. Stat. § 9180) relating to horse-stealing. It was held in Boody v. People 43 Mich. 34, and People v. Jones 49 Mich. 591,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Boody v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. People v. ReggelUtah Supreme Court · 1892
  3. State v. KingenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API