Legal Opinion

Flick ex rel. Flick v. Malino

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 16, 1979No. MM-74PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The lower tribunal granted summary final judgment in favor of appellees, on the ground that appellee Malino’s decedent was immune from liability by virtue of Section 767.04, Florida Statutes. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Plaintiff Jennifer Flick was three years old when, while on Joseph Malino’s property, she allegedly was bitten by Mr. Malino’s dog. Mr. Malino had a “WARNING BAD DOG” sign posted on his property. The Flicks filed two suits, one of which named Pat Malino individually as defendant. See Flick v. Malino, 356 So.2d 904 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The instant case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carroll v. MoxleySupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. Romfh v. BermanSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  3. Flick v. MalinoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. REED BY & THROUGH LAWRENCE v. BowenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Registe v. PorterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API