Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. James

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 8, 1993No. 4-92-0783Published

1DissentJustice Cook

I respectfully dissent.

Under the majority decision a police officer desiring to search a purse which he finds in a car may choose to ask the driver for consent, even though he knows the purse belongs to a passenger. I cannot agree the rights protected by the fourth amendment can be eroded by such an unrealistic doctrine of apparent authority. See Stoner v. California (1964), 376 U.S. 483, 488, 11 L. Ed. 2d 856, 860, 84 S. Ct. 889, 892.

In People v. Bolar (1990), 205 Ill. App. 3d 597, 563 N.E.2d 1225, a driver authorized the police to search his vehicle. Before exiting the vehicle the defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. People v. BolarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API