Legal Opinion

Howard v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided January 15, 1991No. Docket Nos. 26477-88, 1412-89, 16599-89UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE HOWARD AND INGEBORG LEOPOLDINE BURTON, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Howard v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 26477-88, 1412-89, 16599-89

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1991-12; 1991 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 12; 61 T.C.M. (CCH) 1663; T.C.M. (RIA) 91012;

January 15, 1991, Filed

Decisions will be entered under Rule 155.

Wallace Howard Burton, pro se.

J. Mack Karesh, for the respondent.

GOLDBERG, Special Trial Judge.

GOLDBERG

MEMORANDUM OPINION

These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7443A(b)(3). 1

Respondent determined the following deficiencies…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  4. Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Vanicek v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grinalds v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
  2. Gabelman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API