Legal Opinion
United States v. Ingram, Administrative Officer and County Judge, Crittenden County, Ark.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 15, 1953No. 14511_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSEN, Circuit Judge.
The United States sought an injunction to prevent Crittenden County, Arkansas, from dismantling part of the Harahan Bridge, which crosses the Mississippi River and links the States of Arkansas and Tennessee at the City of Memphis. 1 The District Court denied the injunction, 99 F.Supp. 465, and the Government has appealed.
One of the grounds on which the Government sought to prevent the threatened undertaking was that, as a matter of bridge modification, the dismantling project had not been the subject of a submission to and approval by the Chief of Engineers and the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Economy Light & Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- President of the Monongahela Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- The Binghamton BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Miller v. Mayor of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Fort Fetterman v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Oregon Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Tug Go-GetterDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1969
- Fort Fetterman v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Southern Railway Co. v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.