Legal Opinion

Mulrain v. Cohen

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1932Published

1Opinion of the CourtWits chief, J.

The plaintiffs move for an order for examination of the defendant before trial, and requiring the defendant to produce his books and other papers containing entries of the matters involved in the action, etc.

*655The objection that the plaintiffs seek to examine the defendant as to things which they already know must be overruled. (Maria v. Bower, 134 Misc. 800.)

The fact that this is an action for malpractice is not a ground for refusing or limiting an examination before trial. (Storm v. Gair, 212 App. Div. 829.)

It follows that the plaintiffs are entitled to examine the defendant as to each of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maria v. BowerNew York Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Storm v. GairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API