Pedersen v. Eugster
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
Billings, D. J.
In this cause the only question submitted is as to the meaning of the words “working days,” as used in a charter-party executed in the city of New Orleans. The vessel was chartered for a voyage to Trieste. The charter-party provided “that lay days for loading shall be as follows: If not sooner dispatched, 14 working days, Sundays excepted, for loading; and eight days, Sundays excepted, for discharging at Trieste.” The answer admits the allegations of the libel that-days were consumed in lading beyond the lay days allowed in the contract, if only Sundays and holidays are to be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brooks v. MinturnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851
- Angomar v. WilsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
- Frith v. BarkerNew York Supreme Court · 1807
3Cited by5 opinions
- Christopher & Simpson Architectural Iron & Foundry Co. v. E. A. Steininger Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1918
- Hagerman v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1901
- Aktieselskabet Christianssand v. W. R. Grace & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Hughes v. J. S. Hoskins Lumber Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1905
- Sherwood v. American Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925