Legal Opinion

Pedersen v. Eugster

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided December 15, 1882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Billings, D. J.

In this cause the only question submitted is as to the meaning of the words “working days,” as used in a charter-party executed in the city of New Orleans. The vessel was chartered for a voyage to Trieste. The charter-party provided “that lay days for loading shall be as follows: If not sooner dispatched, 14 working days, Sundays excepted, for loading; and eight days, Sundays excepted, for discharging at Trieste.” The answer admits the allegations of the libel that-days were consumed in lading beyond the lay days allowed in the contract, if only Sundays and holidays are to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brooks v. MinturnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Angomar v. WilsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
  3. Frith v. BarkerNew York Supreme Court · 1807

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Christopher & Simpson Architectural Iron & Foundry Co. v. E. A. Steininger Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Hagerman v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1901
  3. Aktieselskabet Christianssand v. W. R. Grace & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  4. Hughes v. J. S. Hoskins Lumber Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1905
  5. Sherwood v. American Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API