Legal Opinion

United States v. Guerrero

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided November 24, 1980No. 38835/AR; CMR No. 14157/SPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

2Per curiam

On this appeal, the appellant asserts that prosecution exhibit 3 was improperly admitted into evidence during the presentencing portion of his court-martial. One of the reasons for his contention is that a judge advocate did not complete block 10 in the appellate action section of the form, as is required by Article 15(e), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 815(e). Under this provision “the next superior authority . . . shall refer the case to a judge advocate . . . for consideration and advice” if the accused has appealed a nonjudicial punishment which includes…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. MackUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  2. United States v. NegroneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. McGaryU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
  2. United States v. HaynesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
  3. United States v. McGaryU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API