Legal Opinion

Baynes v. Allison

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 7, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Complaint. Before Judge Hart. Putnam superior court. September term, 1898.

1Opinion of the Court

.Fish, J.

1. This court can not consider whether there was error in excluding evidence, or in striking a plea, when it does not appear either in the motion for a new trial or in the bill of exceptions what such evidence or plea was.

2. A ground of a motion for a new trial which simply complains that “the court erred in narrowing and restricting the issue in this case to the one proposition, as to whether a contract had been made between plaintiff and defendant as to erecting and placing of these repairs and improvements and the price to be paid for same,” is too general and indefinite an…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Atlantic Compress Co. v. ChamblissCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API