Legal Opinion

Carlin v. Krout

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 9, 1923PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

While passing over an undulating floor, known as the “ocean wave,” in a building at the appellant’s amusement park, the appellee, a woman fifty-nine years of age, suffered the injury which is the occasion of this suit. The only question presented on appeal from the judgment recovered by the appellee is whether there is legally sufficient evidence of negligence in the construction or operation of the amusement device in the use of which she was injured.

The “ocean wave” is composed of a series of five hinged platforms, having an aggregate length of forty-nine feet, which are given a vertical…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Lake Ontario Beach Improvement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Pointer v. Mountain Railway Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  3. O'Callaghan v. Dellwood Park Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Stickel v. Riverview Sharpshooters Park Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Agricultural & Mechanical Ass'n v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Campion v. Chicago Landscape Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  2. Pinehurst Co. v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
  3. Glaze v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  4. Carlin v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  5. Murphy v. White City Amusement Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API