Legal Opinion

Henderson v. State of Georgia

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 11, 1992No. A92A1573PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

This is a case of first impression. At issue, is the interpretation to be given to the language setting forth the time requirement in OCGA § 16-13-49 (o) (5). The trial court denied appellants’ motion to dismiss this condemnation proceeding, ruling that the time requirement set forth in OCGA § 16-13-49 (o) (5) is directory.

On September 13, 1991, the district attorney brought an in rem condemnation proceeding against property seized in a drug raid. Appellants filed answers to the complaint on October 17, 1991. The trial court held a hearing without a jury on February…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bass v. DoughtyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Birdsong & Sledge v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  3. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. SasserSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Alewine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  2. Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Collins v. BirchfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Yoder v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API