Legal Opinion
Sperberg v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 4, 1973No. Civ. No. C72-1067PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*79MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KRUPANSKY, District Judge.
Lawrence R. Sperberg brought this action on October 5, 1972 against Firestone Tire and Rubber Company (hereafter termed “Firestone”), General Tire and Rubber Company (hereafter termed “General”), B. F. Goodrich Tire Company (hereafter termed “Goodrich”), Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (hereafter termed “Goodyear”), and Uniroyal Tire Company (hereafter termed “Uniroyal”), each on behalf of itself and as representatives of others similarly situated. The complaint alleges that Sperberg is the owner of Patent No. 3,563,088 (hereafter termed ’088),…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Jenn-Air Products Co. v. Penn Ventilator, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Cunningham v. JaffeDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1965
- Studebaker Corp. v. Algripco, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1970
3Cited by2 opinions
- Perino v. Cohen (In Re Cohen)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Freeman v. GrayDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022