Legal Opinion

Matter of Hy-Gain Electronics Corp.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided September 27, 1978No. Bankruptcy BK78-0-26, BK78-0-25 and BK78-0-81PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DAVID L. CRAWFORD, Bankruptcy Judge.

During the course of these liquidations, Citibank, N.A., sought to take Rule 205 examinations of various parties, one of which was Richard N. Thompson. Mr. Thompson, an attorney, served simultaneously at various periods as director, Board of Directors Audit Committee member, secretary, treasurer, shareholder and general counsel to the bankrupts. At the taking of the 205 examination, Mr. Thompson produced forty-eight documents which he believed were within the attorney-client privilege. The law firm of Shutan and Trost, appearing on behalf…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  3. Weck v. District Court of Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc., Debtor. Mordecai Weissman and Myron S. Goodman v. James P. Hassett, as Trustee of O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. Matter of OPM Leasing Services, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  3. Kodak v. Mardis, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API